Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dickson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2007No. 7 EAP 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

918 A.2d 95 (2007)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee,

v.

Ravah DICKSON, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 14, 2005.

Decided March 29, 2007.

Karl Baker, Esq., Peter Rosalsky, Esq., Karl Lawrence Morgan, Esq., Philadelphia, for Ravah Dickson.

Hugh J. Burns, Esq., Regina M. Oberholzer, Philadelphia, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.

OPINION

Justice BAER.

We are asked to consider whether the sentencing enhancement codified at 42 Pa. C.S. § 9712, which imposes a mandatory sentence enhancement on a…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Castille; Dissent · Eakin.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API