Legal Opinion

Schumm v. Berg

California Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1951No. L. A. 21830Published

1Opinion of the Court

37 Cal.2d 174 (1951)

231 P.2d 39

JOHAN RICHARD WALLACE SCHUMM, a Minor, etc., Appellant,

v.

PHIL BERG et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents.

Docket No. L.A. 21830.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 11, 1951.

Maurice Rose for Appellant.

Loeb & Loeb, Gang, Kopp & Tyre, Keating Coffey, Robert E. Kopp and Milton A. Rudin for Respondents.

CARTER, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after defendants' demurrer was sustained without leave to amend in an action against a father's estate on a contract for the support and education of an illegitimate child.

Plaintiff, Johan Richard…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Murnick v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Wolford v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API