Legal Opinion

Mead-Richer v. City of Toledo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1961No. 5470PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.

The plaintiffs, appellants herein, duly filed a taxpayer’s suit against the defendants, appellees herein, the city of Toledo, a charter city, joining its mayor and members of council, seeking a permanent injunction enjoining payment by the city of assessments levied by the County of Lucas, on benefited property for the construction of an interceptor sewer, known as Sanitary Sewer No. 49 (a part of which is located within the city by virtue of annexation proceedings), out of the Sewer Rental Fund created by the city by collection of rental charges against city resident sewer users. The trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Education of City School District v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. Indian Hill Acres, Inc. v. KelloggOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Tax Commission v. National Malleable Castings Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Himebaugh v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Cleveland City v. Village of Cuyahoga HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Britt v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City of Wooster v. GrainesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. City of Columbus Ex Rel. Willits v. CremeanOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Alt v. Pazmino-StanfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API