Board of County Commissioners v. City of Columbus
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The main question to be decided on this appeal is whether the city, acting pursuant to its Article XVIII “utility” powers, may construct the proposed sewer lines here at issue without first complying with the limitations contained in R.C. 6117.01.
The provisions of the Ohio Constitution primarily concerned in this cause are:
Section 4 of Article XVIII:
“Any municipality may acquire, construct, own, lease and operate *180within or without its corporate limits, any public utility the product or service of which is or is to be supplied to the municipality or its inhabitants, and may contract with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Britt v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State, Ex Rel. Mowrer v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Columbus v. TeaterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- DeMoise v. DowellOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Mead-Richer v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Toledo Edison Co. v. City of ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Toledo Edison Co. v. ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.