Cleveland City v. Village of Cuyahoga Heights
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HURD, PJ.
This is an action for injunction, whereby plaintiff appellant, City of Cleveland, seeks to restrain defendants appellees from connecting with and discharging sewage into the southerly interceptor sewer constructed and maintained by the City of Cleveland through the Village of Cuyahoga Heights. The Court of Common Pleas denied the injunction and dismissed the petition, and the case is now in this court on trial “de novo” having been submitted by agreement on the record made below.
In the interests of brevity, the plaintiff appellant, City of Cleveland, and the defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ericksen v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Coldwater v. TuckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Minnesota & M. Land & Improvement Co. v. City of BillingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Soundview Woods, Inc. v. Town of MamaroneckNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Mead-Richer v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
- New Brunswick v. MilltownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Snyder v. Village of McArthurOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- City of New Brunswick v. Borough of MilltownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.