Perreault v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
In this declaratory judgment action in Superior Court, Wilfred Perreault and his wife seek a declaration that their insurer under a homeowner’s policy, Maine Bonding & Casualty Company, has the duty to defend Wilfred in a civil damages action brought by the young victim 1 of unlawful sexual contact for which Wilfred had been convicted. 2 The Superior Court (York County, Perkins, J.) granted Maine Bonding’s motion for summary judgment on Perreault’s complaint, finding that despite Perreault’s argument that he did not intend to harm the child, the harm necessarily…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Altena v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Whitt v. DeLeuDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1989
- Burns v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance v. BrennanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State Mutual Insurance v. BraggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Johnson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Peerless Insurance Co. v. ViegasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. PurdySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.