Legal Opinion

Salt Lake, Garfield & Western Railway Co. v. Allied Materials Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1955No. 8372PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORTHEN, justice.

Appeal from a decree entered in plaintiff’s favor in a quiet title action. The facts are not in dispute.

Plaintiff operates a railroad extending west from Salt Lake City.

In 1897 plaintiff’s predecessor, The Sal-tair Railway Company, instituted condemnation proceedings to increase the width of its right of way by 33]4 feet for a length of 899.25 feet. By a decree dated December 6, 1897, the district court in and for Salt Lake County condemned this land and awarded it to the railroad. The decree was not recorded in the office of the County Recorder, as required by law,1 until…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Reilly v. McLeanUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Taylor v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. First American Title Insurance Co. v. J.B. Ranch, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Olsen v. Park Daughters Investment CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API