Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Forgings Co. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 23, 1939No. 6684PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania holding the claims in suit of the Peik patent for a blasting machine valid and infringed. The appellant, Pangborn Corporation, is held to have infringed by making, using and selling the machines, and the -appellant, Pittsburgh Forgings Company, by using the machines. The patent in suit is for a blasting machine which is used for cleaning castings, sheet and other metal articles. The Peik invention is alleged to reside in the fact that directional control was given to a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pangborn Corp. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  2. Pittsburgh Forgings Co. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Pangborn Corp. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API