Legal Opinion
Pangborn Corp. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 17, 1944No. Civil Action No. 193PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
Findings of Fact.
1. On January 8, 1940, Pangborn Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Pang-born,” filed its complaint in this Court against The American Foundry Equipment Company, hereinafter referred to as “American”.
2. In its complaint Pangborn alleged, inter alia, the ownership by it of Rosenberger and Keefer.' application for United States Letters Patent, Serial No. 726,188, *430filed May 17, 1934, for a blasting machine; the ownership by American of application for patent of Louis D. Peik, Serial No. 685,025, filed August 14, 1933, for an invention for a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Teele Soap Mfg. Co. v. Pine Tree Products Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1934
- American Foundry Equipment Co. v. Pittsburgh Forgings Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
- Pittsburgh Forgings Co. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pangborn Corp. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946