Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh Forgings Co. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 20, 1941No. 3178PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
The Pittsburgh Forgings Company and Pangborn Corporation, on April 24, 1941, filed a petition in this court for leave to file a bill of review, and for a rehearing in the case of The American Foundry Equipment Company v. Pittsburgh Forgings Company and Panghorn Corporation at No. 3178 in Equity, in which this court, on January 18, 1938, entered a decree finding valid and infringed United States Letters Patent 1,953,566, granted to Louis D. Peik for improvements in centrifugal blasting machines, and awarding an accounting. On March 23, 1939, the Third Circuit Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- General Electric Co. v. P. R. Mallory & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Egry Register Co. v. Standard Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pangborn Corp. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Pangborn Corp. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944