Legal Opinion

Harwood v. City of Concord

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 9, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Where, as in the instant case, the statute authorizing the condemnation of land under the right of eminent domain provides for the assessment of damages by appraisers, and affords ample remedy for an appeal by the landowner from the report of the appraisers to the Superior Court, where the issue involving the amount of damages may be answered by a jury, the statutory remedy is exclusive, and the landowner cannot ordinarily maintain an action for the recovery of his damages, resulting only from the taking of his land for public purposes. This principle is well settled by decisions of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKinney v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Latham v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Town of Greenville v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Long v. City of RandlemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Lamb v. Elizabeth City.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Smith v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Town of Nags Head v. ToloczkoDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API