Legal Opinion

Town of Greenville v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 24, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The town of Greenville and the other plaintiffs who are landowners brought suit permanently to enjoin the defendant from com-pléting, as now contemplated, the construction of part of a public high way in Pitt County, including a bridge across Tar Eiver. Tbe plaintiffs alleged that if the defendant builds the highway and bridge as contemplated the space under the bridge will be decreased approximately from 1,400 feet to 560 feet, and that the water and power plant of the town of Greenville will be injured and the lands of the other plaintiffs flooded. The defendant answered the complaint, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Griffin v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Staton v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Dorsey v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Jones v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Wilcher v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Rheinhardt v. YanceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Roberts v. Town of CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Long v. City of RandlemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API