State v. Gainey
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The defendant, Ontario I. Gainey, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly responded to a jury question regarding nonexclusive possession and (2) the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to prove that he constructively possessed the heroin found hidden in a car. We agree with the defendant on both claims and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BillieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. WalcottConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. DukesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.