Legal Opinion

State v. Gainey

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 1, 2009No. AC 29143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, J.

The defendant, Ontario I. Gainey, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly responded to a jury question regarding nonexclusive possession and (2) the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to prove that he constructively possessed the heroin found hidden in a car. We agree with the defendant on both claims and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BillieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. State v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  3. State v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. State v. WalcottConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. State v. DukesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API