Legal Opinion

State v. King

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 8, 2014No. AC34932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

Following a jury trial, the defendant, Robert King, was convicted of two counts of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (l) 1 and (3), and thereafter, he was sentenced to a total effective term of nine years of imprisonment to be followed by five years of special parole. On appeal, the defendant contends that his due process rights were violated by having been convicted after a legally inconsistent verdict, on the basis of the manner in which the charges against him were prosecuted, because the state did not claim, through its presentation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Neil R. Cola v. Charles H. Reardon, Sheriff of Essex CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. King v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  3. State v. AliceaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. State v. AliceaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  5. State v. GamerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API