X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
X2Y Attenuators, LLC (X2Y) appeals from the final determination of the International Trade Commission (ITC) that Intel Corporation and other intervenors (Intel) did not violate 19 U.S.C. § 1337 because Intel’s products were not covered by X2Y’s asserted patents. Because the ITC correctly construed the relevant claim terms, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
The asserted patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,609,500 ('500 patent), 7,916,444 ('444 patent), and 8,023,241 ('241 patent) are famil-ially related. The technology disclosed in the asserted…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Telemac Cellular Corporation v. Topp Telecom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- PowerOasis, Inc. v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research and Engineering Co. v. Lubrizol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Blackbird Tech LLC v. Elb Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Finjan LLC v. Eset, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. HQ Specialty Pharma Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- ADM Edible Bean Specialties, Inc. v. American Bean LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- BE Labs, Inc. v. Ubiquiti Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.