Legal Opinion
Telemac Cellular Corporation v. Topp Telecom, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 25, 2001No. 99-1562PublishedCited by 259 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Telemac Cellular Corporation (“Tele-mac”) appeals from a grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California finding claims 1, 4, 6, 9, 18, 20-24, 29 and 30 of Telemac’s U.S. Patent No. 5,577,100 (“the TOO patent”) invalid and not infringed by the TRACFONE system. Telemac Cellular Corp., v. Topp Telecom, Inc., No. 98-CV-22 (N.D.Cal. Aug. 25, 1999). For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
BACKGROUND
Appellant, Telemac, plaintiff below, was formed in the early 1990s with a focus on the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by259 opinions
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., Guidant Sales Corporation, and Eli Lilly and Company v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., Pacesetter, Inc., and Ventritex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. v. Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Skyline Steel, LLC v. PilePro, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Taurus IP, LLC v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
254 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.