Legal Opinion

State v. Cooper

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 5, 2000No. 25192PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOAL, Chief Justice:

The State appealed an order requiring it to pay fees incurred to hire an expert to examine Frank Gary Cooper (“Cooper”) in conjunction with a trial pursuant to the Sexually Violent Predator Act, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 44-48-10 to -170 (Supp.1999). The State simultaneously filed a Petition for a Writ of Supersedeas or for Clarification in the Court of Appeals and a Petition for an Extraordinary Writ with this Court, which was denied as moot. This Court certified this case for review pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR, and, pending the disposition of the merits of the appeal, stayed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. LocklairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Hooper v. RockwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Link v. School District of Pickens CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  2. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. BellardinoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API