Legal Opinion
Edwards v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 4, 2009No. 26662PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice TOAL, Justice WALLER, Justice BEATTY, and Justice KITTREDGE:
We accepted these matters concerning the application for State Fiscal Stabilization (SFS) funds under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)1 in our original jurisdiction. These two cases are brought as the result of a dispute between the Governor of South Carolina and the General Assembly of South Carolina over whether the State should apply for and accept the SFS portion of the ARRA funds. This Court has no role to play in the policy considerations at issue between the Governor and the General…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- South Dakota v. DoleSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hampton v. HaleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Sanford v. South Carolina State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Amisub of South Carolina, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- George S. Glassmeyer v. South Carolina Lottery CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.