Legal Opinion

Antrum v. City of New Haven, No. Cv88-0267211s (Oct. 4, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 4, 1995No. CV88-0267211SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT In this case the plaintiff has sued the city claiming she fell down due to a defective condition in the sidewalk. The defendant city has filed a motion for summary judgment claiming the present action was not properly brought pursuant to § 13a-149 of the General Statutes. At common law a municipality owes no duty to exercise due care to make its highways safe for pedestrian travel and liability can only be based on the statute. Lukas v. New Haven,184…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rowe v. GodouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Marino v. Town of East HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. Bresnan v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Steele v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API