Legal Opinion
Marino v. Town of East Haven
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 5, 1935PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The plaintiff alleged in his complaint that he fell and was injured, on June 2d, 1934, by rea son of a defect in a sidewalk in the defendant town, and by amendment set forth a copy of the notice given on his behalf to the defendant, on June 6th, which disclosed that the only reference therein to his injuries was a statement that he “fell and was injured” and the place specified was on Merline Avenue. A supplementary notice, filed more than six months afterward, stated that the defect was in Coe Avenue instead of Merline Avenue. The defendant demurred to the complaint as so amended on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nicholaus v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Sizer v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Cassidy v. Town of SouthburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Krooner v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Shaw v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Pratt v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Willoughby v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Ferreira v. PringleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Fraser v. HenningerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.