Legal Opinion

Steele v. Town of Stonington

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 23, 1993No. 14497PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether the trial court was correct in granting summary judgment to the defendant town of Stonington on the ground that the plaintiff’s action is based on negligence rather than the municipal highway defect statute.1

This action arises out of an accident that occurred on August 12, 1988. The plaintiff, David Steele, was operating a motorcycle on a road that the defendant had a duty to maintain. His complaint alleged that he sustained serious injuries after a pothole caused him to lose control of his motorcycle and crash into a stone wall. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Rowe v. GodouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Pratt v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Frechette v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  2. Himmelstein v. Town of WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Tiber Holding Corp. v. GreenbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. BomberoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Michalski v. HinzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API