Schroeder v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.
This case presents two issues. First, in a prosecution for murder, is a defendant’s inability to remember engaging in the charged conduct alone sufficient evidence of recklessness to raise the lesser-included offense of manslaughter? Second, did the trial court in this case err in failing to charge the jury on the lesser-included offense of manslaughter? We hold that because the culpable mental states for both murder (intent) and manslaughter (recklessness) relate to the result of the conduct — the causing of the death — evidence that a defendant does not remember engaging in that conduct…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Shanklin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Britain, Samantha AmityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Phillip Bundy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- Roy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.