Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 2003No. 561-03PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.

This case presents two issues. First, in a prosecution for murder, is a defendant’s inability to remember engaging in the charged conduct alone sufficient evidence of recklessness to raise the lesser-included offense of manslaughter? Second, did the trial court in this case err in failing to charge the jury on the lesser-included offense of manslaughter? We hold that because the culpable mental states for both murder (intent) and manslaughter (recklessness) relate to the result of the conduct — the causing of the death — evidence that a defendant does not remember engaging in that conduct…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Shanklin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  3. Britain, Samantha AmityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  4. Phillip Bundy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  5. Roy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API