Legal Opinion
Innovad Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 6, 2001No. 00-1459PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
On summary judgment, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas determined that Microsoft Corp., Psion Incorporated, and Apple Computer, Inc. (among others) did not infringe, either literally or by' equivalents, claim 22 of Innovad, Inc.’s U.S. Patent No. 4,882,750 (the '750 patent). Because claim 22 does not cover any dialer units with a keypad and the accused devices include keypads, this court affirms.
I
The '750 patent claims an automatic telephone dialer system. The claimed system includes: (1) a portable telephone dialer unit, which produces a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In Re Cruciferous Sprout LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- The Gillette Company v. Energizer Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Resource Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Ericsson, Inc. v. Harris Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Kaneka Corp. v. Xiamen Kingdomway Group Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.