Legal Opinion
Kaneka Corp. v. Xiamen Kingdomway Group Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 10, 2015No. 2014-1373, 2014-1399PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kaneka Corporation sued Defendants Xiamen Kingdomway Group Company, Pacific Rainbow International Inc., and Shen-zhou Biology and Technology Co., Ltd., in the Central District of California, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,910,340 (the '340 Patent). The district court granted summary judgment of nonin-fringement based on the district court’s claim construction. Kaneka appealed. For the reasons that follow, we affirm-in-part, vacate-in-part, and remand.
BACKGROUND
Coenzyme Q10 exists in animal cells. Cells use coenzyme Q10 to produce adeno-sine triphosphate, which aids cellular…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Duncan Parking Technologies v. Ips Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Hospira, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Lanard Toys Limited v. Dolgencorp LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier RecreationalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.