McCumber v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hdw. Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
When appellant ceased working for appellee and started in a competing business, appellee sought injunction, claiming the terms of the contract of employment had been violated. The Trial Court granted the injunction; and this appeal ensued.
Appellee, Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Company (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “Federated” and sometimes as “appellee”), is engaged in the fire, casualty, and health insurance business, and does business through local agents in many, if not all, of the States. Appellant, M. C. McCumber, became a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- John Roane, Inc. v. TweedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Bloom v. Home Insurance AgencySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Orkin Exterminating Co. v. MurrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Robbins v. PlantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Witmer v. Arkansas Dailies, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McLeod v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance v. EricksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Rebsamen Ins. v. MiltonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Miller v. Fairfield Bay, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Credit Bureau Management Company v. HuieDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.