Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Plant

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 4, 1927PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). There is no hard-and-fast rule in this State as to what contracts are void as being in restraint of trade, and each case must be judged according to its own facts and circumstances. It is also well settled that a person may legally purchase the business of another for the purpose of removing competition, with an agreement on the part of the seller not to- carry on the same business in the same place for a limited period of time. Covenants of this kind operate to prevent the seller from engaging in a business which he sells, so as to protect the buyer in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Wise v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Nilson v. JonesboroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  5. Shapard v. LesserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. MurrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Girard v. Rebsamen InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Robitaille v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Madison Bank and Trust v. FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API