Legal Opinion

In re Murray

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 21, 1995No. 482, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 52(f). Petitioner John M. Murray (“Murray”) contends that the Board of Bar Examiners (the “Board”) acted arbitrarily and unfairly in refusing to waive the requirements of the Board of Bar Examiners Rule 52.4(c) (“B.R. 52.4(e)”)1 and to issue a certificate of admission into the Bar of the State of Delaware. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the Board acted properly in denying Murray’s petition for a waiver from B.R. 52.4(c) and thus affirm the Board’s decision. Furthermore, we decline to exercise…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re GreenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Petition of NennoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Petition of RubensteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. In Re FischerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  5. In Re ReardonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Applicant No. 5 to the 1994 Delaware Bar & Professional Conduct ExaminationsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. In re CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  3. In Re Petition of Marla Matrice MurphySupreme Court of Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API