In re Murray
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 52(f). Petitioner John M. Murray (“Murray”) contends that the Board of Bar Examiners (the “Board”) acted arbitrarily and unfairly in refusing to waive the requirements of the Board of Bar Examiners Rule 52.4(c) (“B.R. 52.4(e)”)1 and to issue a certificate of admission into the Bar of the State of Delaware. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the Board acted properly in denying Murray’s petition for a waiver from B.R. 52.4(c) and thus affirm the Board’s decision. Furthermore, we decline to exercise…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re GreenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Petition of NennoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Petition of RubensteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- In Re FischerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- In Re ReardonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Applicant No. 5 to the 1994 Delaware Bar & Professional Conduct ExaminationsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- In re CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- In Re Petition of Marla Matrice MurphySupreme Court of Delaware · 2022