Legal Opinion
In re Cahill
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided June 10, 1996No. 8, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Bar Examiners of the Delaware Supreme Court (the “Board”) denying the appellant’s, Thomas E. Cahill’s (“Cahill”) Petition for Special Accommodations in taking the 1995 Delaware Bar Examination. Cahill contends that it was arbitrary, unfair, and a denial of due process for the Board to deny him special accommodations without a hearing. This Court has concluded that Cahill’s contention is meritorious.
Facts
Cahill failed to pass the Delaware Bar Examination in 1991, 1992, and 1993. Following this Court’s decision in Rubenstein,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Petition of RubensteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- In Re ReardonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- In Re HudsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Petition of Marla Matrice MurphySupreme Court of Delaware · 2022
- Witzke v. SeitzDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022