Legal Opinion
L. Fatato, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 22, 1984No. 82 CV 3999PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this diversity-based action seek damages for breach of contract and unjust enrichment based on an alleged oral beer distribution agreement with defendant Miller Brewing Company (“Miller”). Miller has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, arguing that the contract claims are barred by New York’s statute of frauds and that the unjust enrichment claim fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is denied.
Facts
Plaintiff corporations (“Fatato”, “NYS-TS”, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Backus Plywood Corp. v. Commercial Decal, Inc. And Alfred DuhrssenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Philo Smith & Co., Inc. And James E. Rutherford v. Uslife CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Schuler-Haas Electric Corp. v. Wager Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Marcraft Recreation Corp. v. Francis Devlin Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Herzog v. Birmingham Fire Insurance (In Re D. H. Overmyer Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CBS, Inc. v. AhernDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Milton Abeles, Inc. v. Farmers Pride, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Nelson v. Stanley Blacker, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Paper Corp. v. Schoeller Technical Papers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Austin Travel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.