Legal Opinion
Marcraft Recreation Corp. v. Francis Devlin Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 7, 1981No. 78 Civ. 2569 (KTD)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:
In this diversity action to recover damages for breach of an exclusive agency agreement and for unjust enrichment, the defendants have moved for summary judgment. The plaintiff, Marcraft Recreation Corp. [hereinafter “Marcraft”], is a New Jersey corporation engaged in the manufacture of sporting goods equipment including paddle and racquet products. The defendant, Hoelzel S/A [hereinafter “Hoelzel”], is a Brazilian company which manufactures rubber products, including balls used in paddle and racquet sports. The other defendant, Francis Devlin Co.,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lanzi v. BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lanzi v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Gross v. Diversified Mortgage InvestorsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Philo Smith & Co., Inc. And James E. Rutherford v. Uslife CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Dior v. MiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Century Pacific, Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel v. AronoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Albany Insurance Company v. EssesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- ESI, Inc. v. Coastal Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Songbird Jet Ltd., Inc. v. Amax Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.