Legal Opinion
Wiese v. Rainville
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1959No. Civ. 23233PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Parker), J.
In this action for damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from (1) judgment of nonsuit as to defendant Pearce, and (2) judgment, upon a verdict, in favor of defendant Rainville.
As to the judgment of nonsuit, appellant asserts that the evidence was sufficient to support a judgment against Pearce; and that the court erred in rulings as to the admissibility of evidence. As to the other judgment, he asserts error in giving and refusing to give certain instructions.
Defendant Rainville, who was doing business as the Rain-ville Company, was a sales agent for a plastics…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Porter v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Baird v. HodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Fisher v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- City of Los Angeles v. County of MonoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Aguilar v. Riverdale Cooperative Creamery Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gordon v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Halliday v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Ritter & Ritter, Inc. Pension & Profit Plan v. the Churchill Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Spence v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Cappa v. Oscar C. Holmes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.