Legal Opinion
Suzuki Motor Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 6, 1988No. E004900PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDANIEL, J.
Introduction
Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd. (Suzuki), defendant below, by the petition here seeks a writ of mandate to compel the superior court to vacate its order denying Suzuki’s motion to quash service of process and to enter an order granting that motion.
Facts
Suzuki is a Japanese corporation which is named as a defendant in an action now pending in the superior court entitled Peggy Armenia v. Bellflower Suzuki, et al., case No. BCV 003277.
Peggy Armenia, the plaintiff in that action and the real party in interest in this proceeding, allegedly sustained personal injuries while…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Newport Components, Inc. v. NEC Home Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Bankston v. Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Gallagher v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Meyers v. Asics Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1989
- Honda Motor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.