Matter of Estate of Royal
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAVIDSON.
In this will contest, Waynetta Neal, daughter of decedent, Clarence Royal, appeals from the summary judgment denying probate of decedent’s purported will. In entering that judgment, the trial court ruled that because the instrument did not bear signatures of attesting witnesses and was not a holographic will, it was not duly executed in accordance with § 15-11-502, C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6B). We affirm, but on different grounds.
Three months before his death, decedent dictated a purported will to Neal, who was visiting from Texas, in the presence of two neighbors.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dodge v. Department of Social ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Matter of Estate of PetersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- In Re Mikeska EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re the Marriage of HoffnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Estate of RoyalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Furlong v. GardnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Kidwell v. K-Mart Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re the Marriage of SorensenColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Beard v. ParryColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.