Legal Opinion

In Re Mikeska Estate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1985No. 75529PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

140 Mich. App. 116 (1985)

362 N.W.2d 906

In re MIKESKA ESTATE

PAINTER

v.

MIKESKA

Docket No. 75529.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided January 3, 1985.

Thomas A. Doyle, for appellant.

Smith Bros. Law Office, P.C. (by Robert B. Worthy), for appellees.

Before: DANHOF, C.J., and GRIBBS and R.M. SHUSTER,[*] JJ.

2Per curiam

Rose Painter (appellant) appeals as of right from the trial court's order of summary judgment granted pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1) in favor of Tom and John Mikeska, Jr. (appellees) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and an order of dismissal granted pursuant to GCR 1963,…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Warren v. June's Mobile Home Village & Sales, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Kar v. HoganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Cole EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. In Re Estate of FlickerNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re Conant EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. SatrusteguiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Matter of Estate of RoyalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Crook v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. In Re Estate of JungCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Matter of Estate of PetersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API