Vartan v. Harristown Development Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction And Background
Plaintiff, John 0. Vartan, has filed a motion for reconsideration of our memorandum and order, dated March 13, 1987, 655 F.Supp. 430, granting defendants, Harris-town Development Corporation (Corporation) and William Keisling, summary judgment on Vartan’s antitrust and other federal claims. The motion, made pursuant to Local Rule 604, may also be considered as one to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed.Rule Civ.P. 59(e). See DeLong Corporation v. Raymond International, Inc., 622 F.2d 1135 (3d Cir.1980). It is addressed…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Rohrbach v. AT & T Nassau Metals Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Capital Freight Services, Inc. v. Trailer Marine Transport Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Eichenseer v. Madison-Dane County Tavern League, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.