Legal Opinion

Ardis v. Reed

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 25, 1965PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

86 N.J. Super. 323 (1965)

206 A.2d 890

MICHAEL ARDIS AND DANIEL EILE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

CARLTON THOMAS REED, A/K/A CARLTON REED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 26, 1964.

Decided January 25, 1965.

Before Judges GAULKIN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Howard A. Goldberger argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Goldberger, Ostrow, Seigel & Finn, attorneys).

Mr. George P. Moser, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Moser, Roveto & McGough, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLLESTER, J.A.D.

In this automobile negligence…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Delay Ex Rel. Delay v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Vietmeier v. VossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Wytupeck v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  2. Gaido v. WeiserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. Brennan v. BiberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. Mockler v. RUSSMANNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. Domurat v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API