Legal Opinion

People v. Young

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1994No. Docket 157780, 161307, 161438PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJansen, P.J.

This case arises out of a dispute in the interpretation of the consecutive sentencing statutes as they apply to parolees. In No. 157780, defendant Gregory Young appeals as of right following a resentencing at which he was sentenced to 42 to 120 months’ imprisonment for a conviction of breaking and entering an unoccupied dwelling. His sentence is to be served consecutively to his sentence for a prior armed robbery conviction. In Nos. 161307 and 161438, intervenor, Gregory Young, and defendant, Department of Corrections, appeal as of right from the January 6, 1993, order of the Wayne Circuit…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. House Speaker v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ludington Service v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF INS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Smeets v. Genesee County ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hopkins v. Parole BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Thomas v. McGinnisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. HoganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Allen v. Farm Bureau InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API