Legal Opinion

Ludington Service v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF INS.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1994No. Docket Nos. 95123, 95124, (Calendar No. 9)PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

We granted leave to appeal in this declaratory relief action to decide whether Luding-ton Savings Bank’s proposed business plan to purchase and operate an existing insurance agency through its wholly owned subsidiary, Ludington Service Corporation, would violate the Insurance Code. Specifically, we must decide whether the Commissioner of Insurance erred in concluding that the bank’s proposed business plan would violate MCL 500.1207(3); MSA 24.11207(3), MCL 500.2077(2); MSA 24.12077(2), MCL 500.1207(5); MSA 24.11207(5), and MCL 500.1242(3); MSA 24.11242(3). We hold that the commissioner’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dation v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Dussia v. MONROE CTY. EMP. RET. SYS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Western Michigan University Board of Control v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re Network Associates, Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API