People v. Young
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
The defendant was convicted of the offense of grand theft, as charged in an amended information, and also was found guilty on two counts of forgery, as alleged in a separate information, both pleadings having been consolidated for trial before the same jury. From the judgments aforesaid and the order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant prosecutes this appeal.
In urging a reversal, appellant asserts that the evidence was insufficient to warrant the jury in finding him guilty of any of the charged offenses; that the court erred in refusing to permit him to show the general course of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Clark v. Tulare Lake Dredging Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
- People v. RushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. FoderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. ReddickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. CarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.