Legal Opinion

People v. Fodera

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1917No. Crim. No. 663PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. A. Beasly, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the defendant upon the charge of a violation of section 367c of the Penal Code, requiring drivers of automobiles colliding with other vehicles to stop and render a~sistance to the occupants of the vehicle collided with and who may have been injured by such collision, under penalties which render the act or neglect of such drivers in failing of refusing to comply with such requirements a felony.

The facts of this case immediately preceding, attending, and succeeding the collision are substantially these: On the evening of October 31, 1915, a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. People v. DillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Byers v. Justice Court for Ukiah Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ule v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. People v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State v. ParishIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. O'Donnell (1938)California Supreme Court · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API