Salazar v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.
Florencio Salazar, Jr. appeals his conviction for possession of a deadly weapon in a penal institution. In one issue, Salazar contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence. According to Salazar, his due process rights were violated by law enforcement officers destroying potentially exculpatory evidence consisting of a videotape of the prison riot in which he was involved and upon which the charge against him was based. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
We review the trial court’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. Vasquez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- James Eric Higginbotham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Salazar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Michael Castilla v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
- Carlos Gutierrez Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.