State v. Vasquez
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
MAJORITY OPINION
KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.
In this intoxication-manslaughter case, we decide whether the trial court erred in suppressing the results of tests performed on a defendant’s blood sample. The trial court granted a pre-trial motion to suppress this evidence based on the trial court’s conclusion that the State violated the Texas Constitution’s Due Course of Law Clause when the State destroyed the blood sample before trial. Contrary to the trial court’s ruling, we conclude that, in this context, the Texas Constitution’s Due Course of Law Clause provides the same protection as the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Oles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Toledo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Commonwealth v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Jor"Dan Jacqueinn Maurice Lewis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- James Eric Higginbotham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.