Legal Opinion

State v. Vasquez

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided June 28, 2007No. 14-06-00381-CRPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

In this intoxication-manslaughter case, we decide whether the trial court erred in suppressing the results of tests performed on a defendant’s blood sample. The trial court granted a pre-trial motion to suppress this evidence based on the trial court’s conclusion that the State violated the Texas Constitution’s Due Course of Law Clause when the State destroyed the blood sample before trial. Contrary to the trial court’s ruling, we conclude that, in this context, the Texas Constitution’s Due Course of Law Clause provides the same protection as the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Oles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Toledo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  4. Jor"Dan Jacqueinn Maurice Lewis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  5. James Eric Higginbotham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API