Legal Opinion

Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Keller Pneumatic Tool Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 19, 1923No. Nos. 2966, 2961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RUNYON, District Judge.

These cases have to do with improvements in pneumatic hammers, and concern an art which was introduced to the attention of this court many years ago, when the primary patents issued to Boyer, now long since expired, were the subject of consideration, and through other cases reported as hereafter noted. Since those early days, these tools have come into such extensive use, and have been the subject of such varied and successful improvements from time to time, as to make the present art a highly developed one, and with a consequent shrinkage in the scope of possible…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. George Frost Co. v. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
  2. Boyer v. Keller Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
  3. Low v. McMasterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
  4. Westmoreland Specialty Co. v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  5. Cleveland Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Winters & Crampton Mfg. Co. v. Grand Rapids Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API