George Frost Co. v. Cohn
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York'..
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
The‘assignments of error challenge the patentable novelty of the hose supporter which is the subject of the patent to Gorton, No. 552,470, granted December 31, 1895.
The feature of novelty resides only in the material of which the button is composed, as supporters substantially similar to the one patented by Gorton were old, except that instead of having a button with a rubber shank or wholly of rubber the button and shank were of metal. The substitution of the rubber button was an improve*506ment of decided value. Supportei's like that shown and described in the patent…
2Cited by45 opinions
- Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Van Heusen Products, Inc. v. Earl & WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
- Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Low v. McMasterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
- Gasoline Products Co., Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.