Cleveland Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
The specification by which it is averred that “the Circuit Court erred, for want of jurisdiction, in making the order appealed from,” is not sustained; but while it is proper, and perhaps requisite, that this should be stated, it is not necessary to enlarge upon the question of jurisdiction, for we are of opinion that, upon the merits, the preliminary injunction which was granted by the court below should not have been awarded.
This suit was begun by bill of complaint charging the defendants below (appellants here) with infringement of claims 42, 45, 46, 47, and 48 of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boyer v. Keller Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'n v. SteblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Grever v. United States Hoffman Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Broadway Towel Supply Co. v. Brown-Meyer Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Stafford v. Albers Bros. Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Keller Pneumatic Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.