Westmoreland Specialty Co. v. Hogan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Por former opinions, see 145 Fed. 199; 154 Fed. 66, 83 C. C. A. 178; 163 Fed. 289. Before DALLAS, GRAY, and BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judges.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In the court below, Oliver K. Hogan charged the Westmoreland Specialty Company with infringesneut of patent No. 752,903, granted to him February 23, 1904, for a dredge. That court, m an opinion reported at (C. C.) 163 Fed. 289, sustained the patent and found infringement. From a decree to that effect respondent appealed.
The opinion below is so exhaustive that we content ourselves with reference to it for the details of this case. It suffices to say the patent concerns a celluloid top dredge, the principal use of which is holding salt. While at first thought the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hogan v. Westmoreland Specialty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1908
3Cited by20 opinions
- BG Corporation v. Walter Kidde & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. UNITED STATES ENG. & FOUNDRY CO.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933
- Larson v. CrowtherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Application of Bernard L. ZenitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Kennicott Co. v. Holt Ice & Cold Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.