Legal Opinion

Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 11, 1925No. 17521PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*723MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

Both parties to the action request the court to find that the plaintiff could have brought its action under existing law, and that the court take jurisdiction under the proviso of section 151 of the Judicial Code and render judgment in this case. The court, being of opinion that upon the facts established the subject matter of the resolution under which the claim was referred to this court is such that it has jurisdiction to render judgment, has done so.

*724The facts are fully set out in the findings. The plaintiff asserts that the execution by it of the settlement contract…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. L. Coupe Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  2. H. B. Nelson Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  3. Cleveland Crane & Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  4. Kingsbury v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API