Legal Opinion

A. L. Coupe Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 6, 1956No. 50276PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLakamoee, Judge

This action is brought by plaintiff1 to recover damages for an alleged breach of the express and implied provisions of a contract to construct housing facilities for defendant at Oak Nidge, Tennessee, in 1943 and 1944.

Plaintiff bases its claims upon allegations that (1) defendant failed to stockpile lumber in the required sizes and quantities needed at a single location at or near the site of the work; (2) defendant interfered with plaintiff in the hiring and recruiting of labor; (3) defendant failed to construct and maintain adequate roads in the vicinity of the work; and (4) for the return…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bank of Kentucky v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. United States v. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Klamath & Moadoc Tribes of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Shepherd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Niagara Falls Bridge Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  2. Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. J. G. Watts Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. H.L.C. & Associates Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. Inland Empire Builders, Inc., J. C. Boespflug Construction Co., and McLaughlin Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API