Legal Opinion

Cleveland Crane & Engineering Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 15, 1926No. B-4Published

1Opinion of the Court

Booth, JucLge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiff in this case seeks to reopen settlements made ■ in writing between the Government and itself respecting munition contracts cancelled after the armistice. The plaintiff concedes the force o'f the settlements so made, but challenges their finality upon the grounds of duress. Two contracts were entered into between the plaintiff and the Government, one on January 1, 1918, the other April 30, 1918. The subject matter of both undertakings obligated the plaintiff to forge from steel furnished by the Government a large number of pieces…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Smelting and Refining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API