People v. Siko
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Penal Code section 654 proscribes double punishment for multiple violations of the Penal Code based on the “same act or omission.” Decisions of this court have engrafted onto section 654 a judicial gloss interpreting “same act or omission” to include multiple violations committed in an “indivisible” or “single transaction.” (See, e.g., People v. Beamon (1973) 8 Cal.3d 625, 636-639 [105 Cal.Rptr. 681, 504 P.2d 905].) In 1979 the Legislature enacted section 667.6 of the Penal Code1 to increase the punishment for persons convicted of serious sex offenses in certain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. AshmusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.